نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استاد تمام گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)
2 دانشجوی دکتری علوم قرآن وحدیث، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز،ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The presence of specific terms in the Quran that deviate from standard Arabic orthography has historically prompted inquiries into the underlying reasons, justifications, and the validity of these variations. A significant source for this discourse includes the accounts relayed by the Companions and Followers concerning these orthographic anomalies. These accounts explicitly discuss the identification of errors in the Quranic text, alongside the affirmation, denial, or rationale for such discrepancies. However, what exactly are these accounts? How trustworthy are they? And what historical context do they belong to? This article employs an analytical-descriptive approach, utilizing library resources to compile, evaluate, and scrutinize these accounts, with a particular emphasis on identifying their chronological origins. The results suggest that these accounts likely trace back to the latter part of the 3rd century AH regarding both their transmission and textual content, making it challenging to assert their existence during the time of the Companions. Furthermore, the transmission chains associated with the reports attributed to Uthman do not meet the requisite standards for reliability, thus rendering them inadequate as reliable evidence.
کلیدواژهها [English]
یعقوب، أمیل بدیع، الموسوعة الصرف و النحو و الاعراب، ترجمه قاسم بستانی و محمد رضا یوسفی، قم: انتشارات اعتصام، 1420ق.